Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorGrünberg, Teo
dc.contributor.authorAslan, Hasan
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-08T11:35:55Z
dc.date.available2021-05-08T11:35:55Z
dc.date.submitted1988
dc.date.issued2018-08-06
dc.identifier.urihttps://acikbilim.yok.gov.tr/handle/20.500.12812/687830
dc.description.abstract
dc.description.abstractABSTRACT In this thesis it is aimed to explain Carnap's and Quine's notions of conceptual scheme (framework) and ontology. It is argued that the difference `between Carnap's notion of framework and Quine's notion of conceptual scheme comes from their difference in the attitudes toward linguistic usues (mainly toward meahiaigs, references).en_US
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoen
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 United Statestr_TR
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectFelsefetr_TR
dc.subjectPhilosophyen_US
dc.titleAn Analysis of the ontological aspects of conceptual schemes
dc.typemasterThesis
dc.date.updated2018-08-06
dc.contributor.departmentDiğer
dc.subject.ytmOntology
dc.subject.ytmCarnap, Rudolf
dc.identifier.yokid13805
dc.publisher.instituteSosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü
dc.publisher.universityORTA DOĞU TEKNİK ÜNİVERSİTESİ
dc.identifier.thesisid13805
dc.description.pages17
dc.publisher.disciplineDiğer


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess