Önleyici meşru müdafaa hakkı ve uluslararası Hukuktaki yeri

Abstract

ÖZET8OXVODUDUDVà KXNXNWD, GHYOHWOHULQ NXYYHW NXOODQPDODUÃQD GDLU WHPHOdüzenleme, bir jus cogens kural olarak nitelendirilen, %0 $QWODúPDVöQÃQYasak, BMPDGGHVL SDUDJUDIÃQGD JHoHQ NXYYHW NXOODQPD /DVD÷ÃGÃUdevletlerin, herhangi ELU GHYOHWLQ SROLWLN ED÷ÃPVÃ]OÃ÷ÃQD veya$QWODúPDVöQD Â/HÂONHVHO EÂWÂQOÂ÷ÂQH NDUúà %0 $QWODúPDVöQÃQ DPDoODUÃ/OD X/XúPD/DQ KHU WÂUkuvvet kullanma veya tehdidinden VDNÃQDFDNODUÃQÃQJUPHNWHGLU.%0 $QWODúPDVöQÃQ QJUGÂ÷ EX /DVD÷ÃQ NHVLQ YH DoÃN LVWLVQDODUÃQGDQbirisi$QWODúPD¶QÃQPDGGHVLQGHGÂ]HQOHQHQPHúUXPÂGDIDDKDNNÃGÃU0HúUXvuku bulDQVLODKOÃELUVDOGÃUÃ/DNDUúà EDúYXUXODELOHFHNELUKDNWÃU.PÂGDIDDKDNNÃ,%XGÂ]HQOHPH/HUD÷PHQ oHúLWOLHVDVODUWHPHOLQGHQOH/LFLPHúUXPÂGDIDDde YDUGÃU BMKDNNÃQÃQ YDU ROGX÷XQX LGGLD HGHQ JUÂúOHU $QWODúPDVà NDEXOedilmesinden önceQOH/LFLPHúUXPÂGDIDDKDNNÃQÃQYDUROX÷XLGGLDHGLOPHNWHGLU%XDQOD/ÃúDJUH%0$QWODúPDVÃ]DWHQYDURODQQOH/LFLPHúUXPÂGDIDDKDNNÃQÃRUWDGDQ NDOGÃUPDPÃúWÃU %D]à LGGLDODUD JUH GH NXOODQPÃú ROGX÷X LIDGHOHU LOHPDGGH QOH/LFL PHúUX PÂGDIDD KDNNÃQà GD NDSVDPDNWDGÃU hoÂQF RODUDN GD$QWODúPD VRQUDVà GHYOHW X/JXODPDODUÃQÃQ WHPHOLQGH, QOH/LFL PHúUX PÂGDIDDKDNNÃQÃQRUWD/DoÃNWÃ÷ÃLGGLDHGLOPHNWHGLUiddia eden%X oDOÃúPD QOH/LFL PHúUX PÂdafaa KDNNÃQÃQ YDU ROGX÷XQXJUÂúOHU WHPHOLQGH XOXVODUDUDVà KXNXNWD QOH/LFL PHúUX PÂGDIDD KDNNÃQÃQ YDUROXS ROPDGÃ÷ÃQà LQFHOHPHNWHGLU %XQXQ LoLQ NRQX/OD LOJLOL /D]DUODUÃQ JUÂúOHULve konu ile ilgili örneklerle ilgili olarak BM GüvenlikGHYOHW X/JXODPDODUÃKonseyi'niQ/DNODúÃPODUÃGH÷HUOHQGLULOPHNWHGLU

ABSTRACTThe basic principle regulating the use of force by States is the Article 2,paragraph 4 of the UN Charter, which is regarded as a jus cogens rule. Theprinciple provides that all UN member States shall refrain from threat or use offorce against the territorial integrity or political independence of any State, or inany manner inconsistent with the Purposes of the United Nations.One of the clear exceptions to this categorical ban on use of force is the useof force for the purpose of self-defense as regulated in Article 51 of the UNCharter. Accordingly, the right to self-defense can be resorted to if an armed attackoccurs.Despite these regulations, there are opinions arguing that there is a right topreemptive self-defense on the basis of various grounds. Some argue that therehad been a right to preemptive self-defense before the UN Charter was established.According to this opinion, the UN Charter does not abolish this already existingright. Some others interpret the wordings of Article 51 so as to cover thepreemptive self-defense. Thirdly, some argue that a right to preemptive self-defensehas emerged on the basis of recent state practice.This study searches for whether a right to preemptive self-defense exists ininternational law by reviewing the grounds of the opinions favoring that allegedright. To do so, the related opinions of the scholars, state practice and theapproach of the UN Security Council to the relevant examples are reviewed.