Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorGöz, Mustafa
dc.contributor.authorAydin, Mehmet Salih
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-04T15:48:48Z
dc.date.available2020-12-04T15:48:48Z
dc.date.submitted2009
dc.date.issued2018-08-06
dc.identifier.urihttps://acikbilim.yok.gov.tr/handle/20.500.12812/91189
dc.description.abstractAmaç: Bu çalışmada izole koroner bypass olgularında operatif mortaliteyi öngörmede EuroScore ve STS (The Society of Thoracic Surgeons) risk belirleme sistemlerinin klinik uygulanabilirliğinin karşılaştırılması amaçlandı.Gereç ve Yöntemler: Nisan 2005-Mart 2009 tarihleri arasında opere edilen 182 izole koroner bypass olgusunun tüm risk faktörleri, EuroScore ve STS risk belirleme sistemlerine göre prospektif olarak kaydedildi. Öngörülen ve gerçekleşen mortalite oranları her risk skoru sistemi için karşılaştırıldı.Bulgular: Operatif mortalite, 24 hasta ile %13,2 olarak bulundu. EuroScore için beklenen mortalite %4,71±4,9 iken STS için bu oran %1,17±1,35 idi. Beklenen ve gerçekleşen mortalite oranları arasında fark bulunamadı. EuroScore için ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve) altında kalan alan 0.712, STS için 0.727 olarak hesaplandı.Sonuç: Her iki sistemde mortaliteyi öngörme kuvveti açısından, çalışmamızda yeterli olarak bulunmuştur. STS'nin operatif mortalite yanında oluşabilecek morbidite hakkında da bilgi vermesi ek bir avantaj olarak görülebilmesine rağmen çalışmamızda yeterli bulunmamıştır. Sonuç olarak ülkemiz popülasyonu için yeni risk skorlarına ihtiyaç vardır.Anahtar Kelimeler: STS, EuroSCORE.
dc.description.abstractObjective: To compare the feasibility of the EuroScore and STS (The Society of Thoracic Surgeons) risk scoring systems for predicting the surgical mortality of isolated coronary artery bypass surgery patients.Materials and Methods: The risk scoring of 148 patients who were operated on between April 2005 and March 2009 was performed prospectively according to the EuroScore and STS risk scoring systems. The predicted and observed mortality rates according to each scoring system were compared.Results: Hospital mortality was 13,2% (24 patients). The predicted mortality rate according to EuroScore was 4,71±4,9%, whereas it was 1,17±1,35% for STS. There were no significant differences between predicted and observed mortality rates according to either scoring system. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.712 for EuroScore and was 0.727 for STS.Conclusion: Both scoring systems were efficient for predicting mortality rates for our study. It is an advantage of STS that it also gives valuable information about morbidity but for our not found satisfactory. In conclusion new risks scores for our country's population are needed.Key Words: STS, EuroSCORE.en_US
dc.languageTurkish
dc.language.isotr
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 United Statestr_TR
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectGöğüs Kalp ve Damar Cerrahisitr_TR
dc.subjectThoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeryen_US
dc.titleAortokoroner bypass cerrahisi uygulanan olgularda EUROSCORE (European System for Cardiac Operative Risc Evaluation) ve STS (Society of Thoracic Surgeons) risk parametrelerinin karşılaştırılması
dc.title.alternativeComparison of EUROSCORE (European System for Cardiac Operative Risc Evaluation) and STS (Society of Thoracic Surgeons) risk parameters in patients performed with coronary artery bypass surgery
dc.typedoctoralThesis
dc.date.updated2018-08-06
dc.contributor.departmentKalp ve Damar Cerrahisi Anabilim Dalı
dc.subject.ytmCoronary artery bypass
dc.subject.ytmRisk modelling
dc.identifier.yokid351296
dc.publisher.instituteTıp Fakültesi
dc.publisher.universityHARRAN ÜNİVERSİTESİ
dc.type.submedicineThesis
dc.identifier.thesisid236636
dc.description.pages58
dc.publisher.disciplineDiğer


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess