Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorRodgers, Theodore
dc.contributor.advisorJohnston, Susan
dc.contributor.authorTürkkorur, Asuman
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-29T08:01:06Z
dc.date.available2020-12-29T08:01:06Z
dc.date.submitted2005
dc.date.issued2020-11-17
dc.identifier.urihttps://acikbilim.yok.gov.tr/handle/20.500.12812/353057
dc.description.abstractÖZET<,/',=7(.1ø.h1ø9(56ø7(6ø<$%$1&,'ø//(5<h.6(.2.8/87(0(/ø1*ø/ø=&(%g/h0h1'(<$=,03257)g<h'(ö(5/(1'ø50(6ø67(0ø9(2.8<8&8/$5$5$6,*h9(1ø5/ø.Türkkorur, Asuman<ÂNVHN/LVDQV<DEDQFÃ'LO2ODUDNøQJLOL]FHg÷UHWLPL%OÂPÂTez Yöneticisi: Dr Theodore S. RodgersOrtak Tez Yöneticisi: Dr Susan JohnstonTemmuz, 2005%XoDOÃúPD/D]ÃPSRUWI/OHULQLQNXOODQÃPÃQÃYHRQODUÃQRNX/XFXODUWDUDIÃQGDQGH÷HUOHQGLULOPHVLQLDUDúWÃUPÃúWÃUdDOÃúPD]HOOLNOH<ÃOGÃ]7HNQLNhQLYHUVLWHVL<DEDQFÃ'LOOHUYüksek ONXOX7HPHOøQJLOL]FH%OÂP¶QGHJÂQFHORODUDNNXOODQÃODQSRUWI/GH÷HUOHQGLUPHNULWHULLOHoDOÃúPDGDQHULOHQ/HQLSRUWI/GH÷HUOHQGLUPHNULWHULQLQRNX/XFXODUDUDVÃJÂYHQLUOL÷LQLNDUúÃODúWÃUPÃúWÃU.DWÃOÃPFÃODUÃQSRUWI/GH÷HUOHQGLUPHVLVWHPLLOHNULWHUOerÂ]HULQHJUÂúOHULGHDQDOL]HGLOPLúWLUdDOÃúPDEDKDU/DUÃ/ÃOÃQGD<ÃOGÃ]7HNQLNhQLYHUVLWHVL<DEDQFÃ'LOOHU<ÂNVHN2NXOX7HPHOøQJLOL]FH%OÂP¶QGH/ÂUÂWÂOPÂúWÂU9HULOHUSRUWI/GH÷HUOHQGLUPHRWXUXPODUÃRGDNJUXSWDUWÃúPDODUÃYHELUH/VHOJUÂúmelerDUDFÃOÃ÷Ã/ODWRSODQPÃúWÃU$UDúWÃUPD/D<ÃOGÃ]7HNQLNhQLYHUVLWHVL<DEDQFÃ'LOOHU<ÂNVHN2NXOX7HPHOøQJLOL]FH%OÂPÂQGHoDOÃúPDNWDRODQYH/D]ÃPGHUVOHULYHUHQ/HGL÷UHWLPoturumunda, hemJUHYOLVLNDWÃOPÃúWÃUg÷UHWLPJUHYOLOHULLNLIDUNOÃSRUWI/GH÷HUOHQGLUPHNXUXPGDNXOODQÃOPDNWDRODQNULWHULKHPGH/HQLDQDOLWLNNULWHULNXOODQDUDNRQLNL÷UHQFLSRUWI/ÂGH÷HUOHQGLUPLúOHUGLU'H÷HUOHQGLUPHRWXUXPODUÃQÃQQFHVLQGHYHVRQUDVÃQGDRGDNsonunda ise bireyselJUXSWDUWÃúPDODUÃJHUoHNOHúPLúWLU'H÷HUOHQGLUPHRWXUXPODUÃQÃnJUÂúPHOHU/HUDOPÃúWÃU'H÷HUOHQGLUPHRWXUXPODUÃRGDNJUXSWDUWÃúPDODUÃYHJUÂúPHOHUWH/EHND/GHGLOPLúYH/D]Ã/DGNÂOPÂúWÂU+HULNLNULWHUWÂUÂQHDLWRNX/XFXODUDUDVÃJÂYHQLUOLNLNLGH÷HUOHQGLUPHRWXUXPXQGDQelde edilen notlar NXOODQÃODUDNKHVDSODQPÃúWÃUøVWDWLVWLNLDQDOL]VRQXoODUÃLNLGH÷HUOHQGLUPHRWXPXQXQRNX/XFXODUDUDVÃJÂYHQLUOLNVRQXoODUÃQGDKHUKDQJLELUIDUNROPDGÃ÷ÃQÃJVWHUPLúWLU$QFDNRGDNJUXSWDUWÃúPDODUÃYHJUÂúPHOHULQFHOHQGL÷LQGH÷UHWLPJUHYOLHULQLQSRUWIöyGH÷HUOHQGLUPHVLQGHELUoHúLWVWDQGDUWDQDOLWLNYHJÂYHQLOLUNULWHUHVÃFDNEDNWÃNODUÃJUÂOPÂúWÂU$QDKWDUNHOLPHOHU<D]ÃPSRUWI/ÂGH÷HUOHQGLUPHVLRNX/XFXODUDUDVÃJÂYHQLUOLNDOWHUQDWLIGH÷HUOHQGLUPH.
dc.description.abstractABSTRACTWRITING PORTFOLIO ASSESSMENT AND INTER-RATER RELIABILITY ATYILDIZ TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF FOREIGN LANGUAGES BASICENGLISH DEPARTMENTTürkkorur, AsumanMA Department of Teaching English as a Foreign LanguageSupervisor: Dr. Theodore S. RodgersCo-supervisor: Dr. Susan JohnstonThis research study investigated the use of writing portfolios and their assessment by raters.In particular it compared the inter-rater reliability of the portfolio assessment criteria currentlyin use and the newSRUWIROLRDVVHVVPHQWFULWHULDSURSRVHGIRU<ÃOGÃ]7HFKQLFDO8QLYHUVLW/School of Foreign Languages, Basic English Department. The perspectives of the participantson the portfolio assessment scheme and the criteria were also analyzed. This study wascondXFWHGDW<ÃOGÃ]7HFKQLFDO8QLYHUVLW/6FKRRORI)RUHLJQ/DQJXDJHV%DVLF(QJOLVKDepartment in the spring semester of 2005.Data were collected through portfolio grading sessions, focus group discussions andindividual interviews. The participants in the study were seven English writing instructorsFXUUHQWO/ZRUNLQJDW<ÃOGÃ]7HFKQLFDO8QLYHUVLW/6FKRRORI)RUHLJQ/DQJXDJHV%DVLFEnglish Department. The instructors scored twelve student portfolios on two differentsessions using the criteria customarily used in the institution and the new analytic criteria.Focus group discussions were held before and after the grading sessions. At the end of the1grading sessions, instructors were interviewed individually. Grading sessions, focus groupdiscussions and interviews were audiotaped and transcribed.The inter-rater reliability for both of the criteria types was calculated and found to bemarginal. The results of the statistical analysis revealed that there was no difference in resultsof inter-rater reliability between the groups in both of the grading sessions. However, analysisof the focus group discussion and interviews indicated that instructors would appreciate someform of more standardized, analytic and reliable criteria for portfolio grading.Key words: Writing portfolio assessment, inter-rater reliability, alternative assessment.2en_US
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoen
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 United Statestr_TR
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectDilbilimtr_TR
dc.subjectLinguisticsen_US
dc.subjectEğitim ve Öğretimtr_TR
dc.subjectEducation and Trainingen_US
dc.titleWriting portfolio assessment and inter-rater reliability at Yıldız Technical University school of foreign languages basic English department
dc.title.alternativeYıldız Teknik Üniversitesi Yabancı Diller Yüksekokulu temel İngilizce bölümünde yazım portföyü değerlendirme sistemi ve okuyucular arası güvenirlik
dc.typemasterThesis
dc.date.updated2020-11-17
dc.contributor.departmentYabancı Dil Olarak İngilizce Öğretimi Anabilim Dalı
dc.identifier.yokid152005
dc.publisher.instituteSosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü
dc.publisher.universityİHSAN DOĞRAMACI BİLKENT ÜNİVERSİTESİ
dc.identifier.thesisid188491
dc.description.pages138
dc.publisher.disciplineDiğer


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess