1970`den günümüze Türk resminde eleştiri

Abstract

- 115 - SUMMARY In the 1970's our country's economic, political and social changes, works of art and their problems, without a doubt reflected on art and on the relationship between art and its followers. The reflections created the surfacing of hidden opposing wievs and artist formed groups accordingly among themselfs. These groups established around some of the ideas and previously established thoughts and along with this the modern artists personal identity has come into being, and their works have gain prominence. With the advancement of investigative potential and dinamizm on our country's art and cultural life, artists using this potential, striving for the creation of modern, open minded works have come to the fore front. Through out the century, there have been two opposing art wiews in Turkish art field. One of them is collective art, the other one indivitualized art. Due to collective arts relationship with the society its freedom is limited within its borders. In indivitualized art wiev where art has been for art it is taken saperate from society, wree and autonomous. According to many artists, writers and criticis the two wievs have clashed at the foundation but just like other opposing wievs havent been taken to the extreme and have not shown a basic and revolutionary development. In our century, a war (although not said to be a war) on the question of whether works of art are to be evaluated indivitualy or collectively is still alive. Some of our artists, writers and critics who are fighting for their freedom and independence, under the social, polotical, bureaucratic pressure can not come forward and become nonunderstandable in the society, and this condition has been reflected on their works, preventing them to go forward. Our leader artist proposes to reach our national and customary values. With this idea artist during last quater of century turn to public resources. In Turkey not because artist against modern arts, but it is acceped as state directed, changeable art. In modern arts an idea with artist's freedom going away from society, infleance the wiever for new conseption. This understanding and philosophy is still developing in Turkey. While some groups look at this concept as finished, other countinuou to see it as beginning. Understanding of modernizm is not accepted as `being this age's center of art` but as `the reflection of this age's art works`.- 116 Considering we have reached the West's thechnical level of communication, is it possible to reach the same level of art in Turkey? The economic crises through which we are living and its negative effect have been felt in the field of art with negative results. This effect caused an imbalance in the field of art which in the incoming years will fight to regain balance. This without a doubt must be done through an effort by society. When the role of writers and criticts is taken into consideration, it is understood that they are as important as the artist themselves. If we consider in our country that the relationship between artist, writers, and critics is weak the importance of their responsibility can be understood.

- 115 - SUMMARY In the 1970's our country's economic, political and social changes, works of art and their problems, without a doubt reflected on art and on the relationship between art and its followers. The reflections created the surfacing of hidden opposing wievs and artist formed groups accordingly among themselfs. These groups established around some of the ideas and previously established thoughts and along with this the modern artists personal identity has come into being, and their works have gain prominence. With the advancement of investigative potential and dinamizm on our country's art and cultural life, artists using this potential, striving for the creation of modern, open minded works have come to the fore front. Through out the century, there have been two opposing art wiews in Turkish art field. One of them is collective art, the other one indivitualized art. Due to collective arts relationship with the society its freedom is limited within its borders. In indivitualized art wiev where art has been for art it is taken saperate from society, wree and autonomous. According to many artists, writers and criticis the two wievs have clashed at the foundation but just like other opposing wievs havent been taken to the extreme and have not shown a basic and revolutionary development. In our century, a war (although not said to be a war) on the question of whether works of art are to be evaluated indivitualy or collectively is still alive. Some of our artists, writers and critics who are fighting for their freedom and independence, under the social, polotical, bureaucratic pressure can not come forward and become nonunderstandable in the society, and this condition has been reflected on their works, preventing them to go forward. Our leader artist proposes to reach our national and customary values. With this idea artist during last quater of century turn to public resources. In Turkey not because artist against modern arts, but it is acceped as state directed, changeable art. In modern arts an idea with artist's freedom going away from society, infleance the wiever for new conseption. This understanding and philosophy is still developing in Turkey. While some groups look at this concept as finished, other countinuou to see it as beginning. Understanding of modernizm is not accepted as `being this age's center of art` but as `the reflection of this age's art works`.- 116 Considering we have reached the West's thechnical level of communication, is it possible to reach the same level of art in Turkey? The economic crises through which we are living and its negative effect have been felt in the field of art with negative results. This effect caused an imbalance in the field of art which in the incoming years will fight to regain balance. This without a doubt must be done through an effort by society. When the role of writers and criticts is taken into consideration, it is understood that they are as important as the artist themselves. If we consider in our country that the relationship between artist, writers, and critics is weak the importance of their responsibility can be understood.