Diplomatik temsilcinin yargı bağışıklığı

Abstract

Bu çalismada, diplomatik temsilcilere taninan yargi bagisikliginin kapsamini tayineçalistik. Bu kapsami tayin edebilmek için, öncelikle yargi bagisikliginin anlami veniteligi üzerinde durup, diplomatik temsilcinin yargi bagisikliginin nasil bir tarihselgelisim süreci geçirdigi ve kabul edilmesindeki gerekçeyi ortaya koymaya çalistik.Diplomatik temsilcinin yargi bagisikliginin ne zaman baslayip ne zaman sona erdiginiinceledikten sonra, diplomatik temsilcinin bu süre içerisinde faydalandigi yargibagisikliginin neleri kapsadigi üzerinde durduk. Yaptigimiz bu çalismada, sonuçolarak, diplomatik temsilcilere taninan yargi bagisikliginin devletler arasindakidiplomatik iliskilerin etkin sekilde yürütülmesini sagladigi ve bu nedenle uluslararasialanda baris ve isbirligine hizmet ettigi, ancak diplomatik temsilci hakkinda yargilamayapilmamasinin hakkaniyete aykiri sonuçlar dogurabilecegi gerekçesiyle sinirlanmasigerektigi kanaatine ulastik.

In this study, we tried to determine the extent of the jurisdictional immunity ofdiplomatic representatives. In order to determine this, first of all by concentrating onthe meaning and qualification of jurisdictional immunity, we tried to explain historicaldevelopmental process of jurisdictional immunity of diplomatic representative andreason of its acceptance. After examining when diplomatic representative?sjurisdictional immunity starts and ends, we focused on what is being included in thejurisdictional immunity which diplomatic representative benefits from in that period.In conclusion, we decided that jurisdictional immunity enjoyed by diplomaticrepresentative secures active functioning of diplomatic relations between states andthus serves for peace and cooperation in the international arena, but it should belimited for immunity that prevents diplomatic representative from being judged by thereceiving state can lead to unfair results.